VSI evaluates whether a company's AI claims are real, substantive, and defensible. We determine technical reality — not marketing narrative.
The question every investor must ask —
"Is this real?"
API usage vs internal model. External vs controlled inference. Dependency risk quantification.
Wrapper, orchestrator, platform, or infrastructure classification against VSI taxonomy.
Marketing claims assessed against real technical capability. Discrepancy identification.
Real-world testing of system behaviour, performance, and consistency.
Dependency risk, data exposure, misleading positioning, and sovereignty classification.
Every company assessed through VSI is classified into one of six categories, creating a standardised language for AI credibility.
Thin API wrapper with low technical moat and high dependency risk.
AI is a feature within a broader product. Limited technical moat.
Multiple AI models coordinated through a platform architecture.
Proprietary fine-tuning on foundation models with domain-specific data.
Owns and controls the inference and deployment infrastructure.
Fully private, sovereign AI system with independent model control.
A composite score from 0–100, weighted across four critical dimensions of technical reality.